|
Members Annual
Coach Tour.
Last year's tour took place on 31 October and was the best attended
over recent years. This year's tour is provisionally scheduled for
30 October.
Minutes
of the Annual General Meeting of the Trust held at
Ashford School on Wednesday 28 May 2003
Following refreshments,
the meeting was convened at 7.30 pm with Neville Green in the chair.
There were some 45 members of the Trust present.
Apologies for
absence were received from Committee member Borough Council Deputy
Leader Cllr. Paul Bartlett and from Honorary Treasurer Grahame McKenzie,
also from Michael Clover and Trevor Campbell.
The Chairman
welcomed the Countess Mountbatten, Patron of the Trust, and all
members and friends of the Trust present. He then introduced the
top table - himself continuing as Trust Chairman, Ian Grant as Chairman
Designate, and the speaker for the evening, Leader of Kent County
Council Sir Sandy Bruce-Lockhart.
AGENDA
1. To adopt
the minutes of the General Meeting of 30 May 2002
The minutes
having been circulated prior to the commencement of the meeting,
it was proposed, seconded and agreed unanimously that they be adopted.
2. Chairman's
Report
Commenting that
his Autumn 2002 and Spring 2003 reports, with related attachments,
had been mailed to the membership as usual and additionally that,
as also now usual, they are to be found on the Trust's web site
he drew attention to the fact that the Trust's activities currently
focus much more on the larger local matters, such as Ashford's expansion,
the M20 Junction 10 problems, wind power, CTRL matters & the
fast commute, water resources & the like, rather than on the
occasional objectionable planning application brought to the Trust's
attention. This shift in focus is a direct result of the Committee's
involvement in the process of consultation with local government
and with central government at the House of Commons level. However
that is not to say that the Trust is no longer interested in individual
planning applications - very recently the Trust submitted a strongly
worded objection to a proposed telecommunications mast installation
at, of all places, the highest, most exposed and therefore the most
visible point in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty within the
Trust's constituency area.
(NOTE: The Borough Council subsequently refused the application).
The debate on
Ashford's future and its housing expansion continues, with Ashford
Borough Council empowered by Whitehall to proceed via the creation
of a Delivery Board. This Board is charged presently with identifying
what it is that makes Ashford different now and what is to make
it different in the future, by developing a "brand", by
identifying how and where some 30,000 new homes and 29,000 new jobs
can be provided within a Local Development Framework (as the old
Local Plan is now to be called). The Delivery Board is to identify
a 30-year transport strategy and to commence to plan design and
sustainability standards. Formidable tasks, yes, but in the Trust's
view, on the record in the House of Commons, perhaps one of the
most challenging of all its tasks will be delivery over the period
of the 29,000 new jobs required locally to prevent Ashford becoming
a dormitory town. The Trust takes this view because what must come
before the jobs is the incentive to new employers to locate in Ashford;
that will require very much more than Ashford's present supply of
labour, by then possessed of all the many diverse vocational, technical,
technological and business management skills needed by capital-intensive
industry. Those skills start in local schools and colleges yet to
be built. Certainly what we don't need here in the Garden of England
is the option of an alternative labour-intensive industry of the
metal bashing, smoke stack variety.
3. Honorary
Treasurer's Report & Accounts for the year to 5 April 2003
In the Treasurer's
absence the Chairman drew attention to the accounts and the report
on them circulated prior to the meeting. He commented that they
make satisfactory reading, with the Trust's financial position remaining
sound at an accumulated surplus of £3,049 (£2,996 in
2002). As there were no questions from the floor, it was then proposed,
seconded and agreed unanimously that the accounts and report be
adopted.
4. Life Membership
Clause 4(1)
of the Trust's Constitution permits the Chairman to introduce and
deal with other business at General Meetings. The Committee had
earlier resolved that it be proposed at this General Meeting that
with immediate effect the public should be given the additional
option of joining the Trust as Life Members, or converting to Life
Membership, at one-time subscriptions of £50 for Single Life
Membership and £90 for Joint Life Membership. It is anticipated
that introduction of such categories of membership will additionally
lessen the administrative burden on the Trust's Officers. This resolution
was so proposed, seconded, agreed by those present and adopted.
5. Election
of Committee & Officers
The Chairman
reminded members that Ian Grant was elected as Chairman Designate
at the last General Meeting, to take over as Chairman on taking
up residence in his Ashford home. This he has yet to accomplish.
Nor has the incumbent Chairman yet achieved his planned move from
Ashford to his London home. The status quo agreed at the last General
Meeting therefore prevails, with those members present indicating
continuing agreement.
There having
been no co-options to the Committee since the last General Meeting
and no member of the Committee having indicated a wish to stand
down, all were so deemed to have offered themselves for re-election
to the Committee for a further year, with all Officers retaining
their present positions. Accordingly it was proposed that they be
so re-elected en bloc. This was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
6. Any other
business
There being
none, the formal business of the meeting concluded.
The Chairman
then invited Sir Sandy Bruce-Lockhart, well known to many present,
to speak.
Sir Sandy, who
spoke without notes, gave the meeting a clear Kent County Council
overview of the position today in regard to Ashford's much debated
future, explaining that, in very many respects, the strategies adopted
to date by the Borough Council to reach today's position have been
consistent with strategies employed at County Hall in dealings with
Whitehall, over the period & on the same subject. He emphasised,
however, that whilst to date County Hall has disagreed and continues
to disagree with Whitehall on some basic development points of principle,
it has not been possible for the County to go so far as to institute
High Court proceedings against the Whitehall view because the odds
against success are judged to be more than the 50% ceiling allowed
to Councils in order to spend tax-payers money on such issues.
Referring to
the Chairman's earlier remarks on the creation of a Delivery Board
to handle Ashford's development preliminaries, Sir Sandy strongly
advocated earliest dialogue with the Board by the Trust and other
relevant organisations on issues of concern.
(Click here to read the Trust's
comments about the Delivery Board's statements on the need to ensure
a balance between new homes and new jobs.)
At the conclusion
of his short talk Sir Sandy responded at length to the very many
questions arising from the floor, before a Vote of Thanks to the
speaker was proposed on behalf of those present by Committee member
Charles Wilkinson.
The meeting
was then adjourned, at 9 pm.
Your Committee
is always in need of new members, especially at this critical time
in Ashford's development. Volunteers are most welcome.
|